Two years after a U.S. District Court decision that sent shock waves through the contemporary art world, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed that earlier finding that Richard Prince infringed the copyright of Patrick Cariou. Instead, the appeals court ruled that all but five Prince works at issue were fair use under the Copyright… Continue Reading
Monthly Archives: April 2013
DC Circuit Reinstates All Claims that Were Dismissed in Herzog Case Against Hungary-UPDATED
Posted in Foreign Sovereign Immunities, Restitution, World War IIThe DC Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated the entire set of claims brought by the Herzog heirs against the Hungarian National Gallery, the Budapest Museum of Fine Arts, the Museum of Applied Arts, and the Budapest University of Technology and Economics. The appellate decision focuses on the claim that an agreement was reached after WWII… Continue Reading
Mask of Ka Nefer Nefer Settlement Talks Fail, Appeal Back on the Docket
Posted in Collections, CustomsAfter a report from the United States that settlement talks in the civil forfeiture case against the Mask of Ka Nefer Nefer at the St. Louis Art Museum were sufficiently promise to suspend the briefing schedule in the Court of Appeals, the government has advised the court that those talks have failed. The government’s appellate… Continue Reading
Boston Globe spotlights S&W Client Mark Rappaport’s Battle for His Film Collection
Posted in CollectionsThe Boston Globe addressed this week Sullivan & Worcester LLP client Mark Rappaport’s dispute with Boston University professor Ray Carney concerning the custody of Rappaport’s original film archive. My partner Kevin Colmey has represented Rappaport in this regard for over a year, and I appeared on Rappaport’s behalf at a hearing last year as well. … Continue Reading
“Flea Market Renoir” Possibly Taken from Baltimore Museum Heads to Court
Posted in Civil Forfeiture, MuseumsThe 1879 Pierre-Auguste Renoir painting entitled “Paysage Bords de Seine” that was discovered at a Virgina flea market, but which may also have been stolen from the Baltimore Museum of Art more than sixty years ago, is now the subject of a federal court case in Alexandria, Virginia. The United States has seized the painting and… Continue Reading
New Sullivan & Worcester Advisory: Supreme Court Responds to Museums’ Concerns in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Posted in CopyrightThe Sullivan & Worcester LLP Art and Museum Law Group has issued a new client advisory about the Supreme Court’s decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. As analyzed in the advisory, the Court has extended the “first sale” doctrine of the U.S. Copyright Act to copies of protected works that were lawfully… Continue Reading
Second Lawsuit Against Metropolitan Museum of Art About Admissions Policy
Posted in Museums, UncategorizedFor the second time in less than four months, a complaint has been filed against the Metropolitan Museum of Art over its admissions fee policy. Whereas the November, 2012 action seeks injunctive relief to compel the Met to change its practices, the newest case has been filed as a class action and seeks money damages as well. … Continue Reading
ALI-CLE Legal Issues in Museum Administration Next Week in Chicago
Posted in EventsI’m still working on my writeup of last week’s terrific Art and Heritage Disputes conference in Maastricht, but with no rest for the weary I’m looking ahead to ALI-CLE’s annual Legal Issues in Museum Administration conference next week in Chicago. As usual, the program and faculty are world-class. Hope to see you there. The schedule… Continue Reading